A canna’ change the laws of physics

Scotty, The Naked Time, stardate 1704.3, Episode 7

Premature publication and the infra-red ‘cure’

Posted by apgaylard on July 17, 2008

Alzheimers Helmet

Alzheimer's Helmet

Given my current near-obsession with LEDs and phototherapy, I was pleased that the nice people at Holford Watch pointed me to the Mail on Sunday. As I’m not a regular reader of this august journal of record; without this prompt, I would have totally missed this intriguing headline, “Dementia patient makes ‘amazing’ progress after using infra-red helmet“.

It sounds like science-fiction.  The story reports that after wearing a ‘hat’ that allowed 700 LEDs to ‘bathe’ his brain with infra-red light Clem Fennell has experienced an amazing remission in his, “aggressive type of dementia“.  Initially he was, “unable to answer the phone, order a meal or string more than a couple of words together”.  After a series of treatments his deterioration has, reportedly, stopped; he responds more quickly to people when they talk to him; can order his own meals in restaurants; and can go to the bank or post-office on his own.

This is an amazing story and I hope that Mr Fennell’s remission continues.  However, it opens up some interesting questions: how likely is it that the treatment is the cause of his remission?  How likely is this to be very good news for many more sufferers and their families?

These are very difficult to answer.  It is clearly very early-days for this device.  The article tells us that it has, “yet to be proven in clinical trials” and, “It is too soon to say whether [it] could help other sufferers.”

It also adds, “The symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia can vary from day to day – and relapses are not unusual.” This raises the issue of whether the natural history of the disease could be the key factor here; would this remission have happened anyway?  This is why a controlled trial is necessary, as the article points out.

The development of this device has been carried out at the University of Sunderland in conjunction with Dr Gordon Dougal, a director of Virulite, a medical equipment manufacturer.

So, how do the researchers think their device may work?  The Mail comments that the infra-red radiation used is, “thought to be the right wavelength to stimulate the growth of brain cells, slowing down the decline in memory and brain function and reversing symptoms of dementia.”

To do this the radiation must penetrate the structures of the head and pass into the brain.  Can the infra-red radiation do that? 

It seems that near infra-red radiation (NIR) can, in fact, penetrate the structures of the head and pass into the brain.  In fact, NIR spectroscopy (NIRS) can be used, “for non-invasive assessment of the brain function through an intact skull in human subjects by detecting changes in blood haemoglobin concentrations associated with neural activity.” 

It also appears that transcutaneous reflectance-mode NIRS can be used to measure cerebral oxygenation.  In this application an NIR source is placed on the skin, along with a detector a few centimetres away.  The radiation passes through skin and bone, penetrating (to some degree) the brain; before being ‘reflected’ and completing the return journey back to the detector.  Although there seems to be some contention about how much of the optical path is through the brain but, again, the idea that an external NIR source can illuminate the brain (at least to some extent) is reasonable.

(Though in 2006 a Nature News feature commented that in, “the near infrared spectrum, photons may penetrate several centimetres into the body.”  That does make me wonder how substantial the irradiation of the brain might be)

The next question is, if it can ‘bathe’ the brain in infrared radiation, is that of any use?

The idea that it might be seems to have come from a treatment for cold sores.  Virulite markets NIR therapy machines for the treatment of cold sores and wrinkles. (They claim that the cold sore treatment is now available on prescription from the NHS.)

It seems that some work has been done on an animal model – mice.  The paper, published in the Journal of Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, concludes that exposure to NIR resulted in, “middle-aged mice being more considerate in their decision making, which results in an overall improved cognitive performance which is comparable to that of young … mice.”

This work used NIR with a wavelength of 1072 nm (9268 cm-1).  This was selected, sensibly, to avoid the NIR absorbance band of water.  From there it seems that an early prototype was tested.  This was covered by both the Mail and BBC in January.  The BBC report contains a brief reference to a small unpublished, trial, “In tests in people with dementia using infra-red lasers, eight out of nine people showed some improvement.”

Reassuringly, the Mail on Sunday article reported, “Dr Dougal stressed that a full, clinically controlled trial would be needed before his anti-dementia helmet could be licensed for public use. A trial of 100 patients is expected to start later this year.”

So there seems to be some sensible progression here, from mice to men; along with the promise of an apparently reasonable trial.  Given that humans can’t see in the NIR part of the spectrum it doesn’t seem to hard to devise a good sham treatment.  No Rudolph effect here!

Are there any reasons to be cautious?  I’d say that there are.  Aside form the obvious lack of a decent trial published in a peer-reviewed journal, there is a nagging question in my mind about the plausibility of a mechanism involving NIR, which could halt and turn back dementia.

There seems to be some uncertainty surrounding the cause of Alzheimer’s disease.  If this is the case can we really be sure that stimulating the growth of brains cells will solve the problem?  The claims that are made for this device often mention dementia; there are many kinds, with different causes – will a single therapy cure them all?

Perhaps that is why the coverage on the Nature blog, The Great Beyond, was quite cautious.  Unlike the uncritical bulk of the media coverage ABC News carried a sceptical article in January.  It included these quotes:

I have not heard of anything along these lines before. Who knows what it is? But it sounds more hocus-pocus than anything,”

Dr. Ronald Peterson, director of the Alzheimer’s research centre at Mayo Clinic.

I cannot conceive of any underlying biological mechanism by which that could work

Zaven Khachaturian, editor-in-chief of Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association

Add to this that Dougal has a direct financial interest in the product and that some of the clinical evidence presented on Virulite’s website for their other products is less than convincing (the cold sore machine is, “medically proven” on the basis of a pilot study and the anti-wrinkle evidence is very thin): caution is in order.

Also the briefly reported small unpublished trial result of “some improvement” (in eight out of nine patients) seems to be a more modest claim than the ‘amazing’ result reported by the Mail on Sunday.  This, again, gives pause for thought.

So, what can we make of this device? It would be truly marvellous if it turns out to work – but it’s just way too early to say.  It’s certainly too early for raising hopes.

This is yet another example of science by press release.  If a decent sized, well-designed trial published in a respectable peer-reviewed journal came out with a good result then that would be worth covering.  As it is, this seems to be raising hopes prematurely.  I hope that they don’t prove to be false hopes.

Other coverage

3 Responses to “Premature publication and the infra-red ‘cure’”

  1. dvnutrix said

    That would be because somebody ended up in a deeply surreal conversation with someone who was asking if infra-red light hair-dryers (apparently, available at all good hairdressers but not barber shops) would have a similar effect. However, the conversation foundered on the issue of whether the infra-red lights were near IR or other types and I had to say that I thought the dryers would have to be far IR, like those so-called ‘detoxing’ fIR saunas, but what would I know. (Yes, these saunas are supposed to melt toxins out of your body fat and you sweat them out through your skin in some mechanism that nobody ever told me about for some odd reason. Particularly if someone shines a blue light on you – I’m not making this up.)

    BIOLAB, I told her, had advised using an infrared sauna because it mimics the energy emitted naturally by the body, so the heat gets deeper into your fat cells than a conventional sauna and the toxins are sweated out on the skin.

    You have to scrub yourself in the shower afterwards, though, or the toxins are reabsorbed…

    The Physiotherm, an enclosed wooden box with seating for two, hummed gently in the corner, blue light spilled through its glass door.

    “Blue is associated with spiritual awareness,” purred the receptionist, “but you can choose a different colour therapy if you want.”

    I, too, wish the LED helmet Daily Mail chap and his family well. I wonder if people are going to carry on seeking the treatment for their own family members.

    Thanks for your explanation and perspective.

  2. draust said

    Figured you would be onto this one, AP.

    I have to say I’m with Dr Peterson. I knew NIRS existed – even (non infra) red light penetrates tissue pretty well, something fingertip pulse oximeters rely on, and way back in my grad student days I vaguely knew some of the people who pioneered using NIRS to detect cerebral (haemoglobin) oxygenation levels in premature babies. So the idea that NIR light penetrates tissue is well-established.

    (Short digression: broadly speaking, the longer the wavelength of visible light, the further it penetrates into tissue, and infra-red is even better. In contrast, UV is absorbed in the surface tissue layers and does not penetrate at all).

    But… since the light penetrates into and through tissue by virtue of NOT being absorbed (i.e. there is nothing much in tissue that absorbs these NIR wavelengths, other than Haemoglobin, hence red light pulse oximeters and water..) ..how is it supposed to be having “effects on cells”??! I think that is basically why Khachaturian is so sceptical.

    Plus the coming and going good-days-and-bad nature of the disease… hmmm…

    So.. as you say, there is a paper, but I won’t be buying stock in Virulite on the basis of n = not very many, a nice anecdote and a press release. I would say, “one to revisit in a few years”, except that one fears someone will market a rival version over the internet within a few months. *sigh*

  3. apgaylard said

    dvnutrix: Thanks again for the tip and kind comment. I’m not sure how much perspective I’ve been able to generate, there’s so little real info available. I must admit that I find the whole phototherapy thing baffling. There may be some real stuff in there – but there’s so much thats nonsense; fIR saunas are a good example of the latter.

    draust: Insightful as ever. The non-absorbance thing did cross my mind (there’s a bad pun lurking in here) – but evidently not long enough to make it to the keyboard. Thanks for pointing it out. I must admit when I first started looking at this I didn’t rate the chances of IR penetrating the head into the brain and I was a bit worried about water. I did do a little UV/Vis/IR spectroscopy when I did my degree and a year-long industrial placement in an analytical chemistry lab, but I was struggling to remember some of the key facts. So it’s been a useful bit of revision (one of my aims in starting to blog).

    After looking at the available data I must say that I am sceptical, but prepared to be surprised. A viable mechanism seems elusive. The Virulite website ‘evidence’ pages increase my unease. The ‘NHS approved’ cold sore cure was a surprise. As you say, one to revisit when the work has been done.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: