<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Homeopathy and the Natural History Museum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apgaylard.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/homeopathy-and-the-natural-history-museum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apgaylard.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/homeopathy-and-the-natural-history-museum/</link>
	<description>Scotty, The Naked Time, stardate 1704.3, Episode 7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:26:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: apgaylard</title>
		<link>http://apgaylard.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/homeopathy-and-the-natural-history-museum/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>apgaylard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 22:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apgaylard.wordpress.com/?p=453#comment-695</guid>
		<description>draust:
Thanks for the clarification - I misremembered the blurb on Milgrom&#039;s website.  The PhD is interesting as it marries an entirely proper discipline with nonsense.  I would question whether respectable scientists need to be a bit more circumspect: is classifying the contents of the recipe for pixie dust really science?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>draust:<br />
Thanks for the clarification &#8211; I misremembered the blurb on Milgrom&#8217;s website.  The PhD is interesting as it marries an entirely proper discipline with nonsense.  I would question whether respectable scientists need to be a bit more circumspect: is classifying the contents of the recipe for pixie dust really science?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: draust</title>
		<link>http://apgaylard.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/homeopathy-and-the-natural-history-museum/#comment-694</link>
		<dc:creator>draust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apgaylard.wordpress.com/?p=453#comment-694</guid>
		<description>I think Loopy Lionel was her PhD External Examiner, AP, not the supervisor; the info is in Lionel&#039;s homeopathic bio &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.galahomeopathy.com/ArticleView.aspx?hidden=y&amp;id=822&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, which I guess is the source you were referring to.

The two supervisors mentioned for her PhD are both very respectable scientists in plant systematics (classification); Barnett has now retired from Reading and is an Emeritus Prof, while Humphries was a long-time Nat Hist Museum (NHM) bod and a very big cheese in systematics. I think he too may now have retired, as he is not listed on the NHM&#039;s staff list and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.systass.org/news/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Systematics Association has just held a &lt;i&gt;Festschrift&lt;/i&gt; for him&lt;/a&gt; (presumably to mark his retirement). Humphries is a past President of the Systematics Assocn. 

Personally I would hazard a guess that this was a part-time &quot;external&quot; PhD self-funded by the student (who is, of course, a practising homeopath). The two supervisors presumably took it as a problem in plant systematics and thus independent of whether homeopathic remedies actually contain any plant matter from the plants in the &quot;homeopathic formulary&quot;.

The NHM is next door to Imperial (where LL used to work in his latter day &quot;proper scientists&quot; incarnation) so I could believe he would seem an obvious choice as a &quot;sympathetic&quot; examiner for what might have been a rather thin sort of a PhD thesis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Loopy Lionel was her PhD External Examiner, AP, not the supervisor; the info is in Lionel&#8217;s homeopathic bio <a href="http://www.galahomeopathy.com/ArticleView.aspx?hidden=y&amp;id=822" rel="nofollow">here</a>, which I guess is the source you were referring to.</p>
<p>The two supervisors mentioned for her PhD are both very respectable scientists in plant systematics (classification); Barnett has now retired from Reading and is an Emeritus Prof, while Humphries was a long-time Nat Hist Museum (NHM) bod and a very big cheese in systematics. I think he too may now have retired, as he is not listed on the NHM&#8217;s staff list and the <a href="http://www.systass.org/news/" rel="nofollow">Systematics Association has just held a <i>Festschrift</i> for him</a> (presumably to mark his retirement). Humphries is a past President of the Systematics Assocn. </p>
<p>Personally I would hazard a guess that this was a part-time &#8220;external&#8221; PhD self-funded by the student (who is, of course, a practising homeopath). The two supervisors presumably took it as a problem in plant systematics and thus independent of whether homeopathic remedies actually contain any plant matter from the plants in the &#8220;homeopathic formulary&#8221;.</p>
<p>The NHM is next door to Imperial (where LL used to work in his latter day &#8220;proper scientists&#8221; incarnation) so I could believe he would seem an obvious choice as a &#8220;sympathetic&#8221; examiner for what might have been a rather thin sort of a PhD thesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apgaylard</title>
		<link>http://apgaylard.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/homeopathy-and-the-natural-history-museum/#comment-693</link>
		<dc:creator>apgaylard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apgaylard.wordpress.com/?p=453#comment-693</guid>
		<description>pleick: Thanks for your comment.  During my googling I came accross a reference to Bharatan having a background in chemistry; but the quality of the source wasn&#039;t very good.

I did find out that one of her PhD supervisors was one Lionel Milgrom.  That probably says it all about the value of her PhD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pleick: Thanks for your comment.  During my googling I came accross a reference to Bharatan having a background in chemistry; but the quality of the source wasn&#8217;t very good.</p>
<p>I did find out that one of her PhD supervisors was one Lionel Milgrom.  That probably says it all about the value of her PhD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pleick</title>
		<link>http://apgaylard.wordpress.com/2008/12/20/homeopathy-and-the-natural-history-museum/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>pleick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apgaylard.wordpress.com/?p=453#comment-692</guid>
		<description>That a reputable museum would hire somebody whose main qualification seems to be a PhD in homeopathy as a research associate is worrying in itself. You could just as well give the zoology deparment to a leading expert on unicorns.
I suppose that it would be mentioned in your quote if Bharatan had a degree in a real scientific discipline...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That a reputable museum would hire somebody whose main qualification seems to be a PhD in homeopathy as a research associate is worrying in itself. You could just as well give the zoology deparment to a leading expert on unicorns.<br />
I suppose that it would be mentioned in your quote if Bharatan had a degree in a real scientific discipline&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
